Open Access

The chemistry and bioactivity of various heartwood extracts from redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) against two species of fungi

  • Nicholas Tuatahi Davies1,
  • Hsin-Fu Wu1 and
  • Clemens Michael Altaner1Email author
New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science201444:17

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40490-014-0017-4

Received: 8 May 2013

Accepted: 12 June 2014

Published: 15 July 2014

Abstract

Background

Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don) Endl.) (redwood) has the potential to be grown in New Zealand in commercial forestry operations and is valued for its naturally durable heartwood. A viable redwood industry based on planted forests can only be achieved if the timber produced meets quality expectations, in particular durability. Natural durability is highly variable among trees. Also, a within-tree pattern of low durability close to the pith has been observed. Natural durability is preliminarily caused by secondary metabolites deposited into the cell walls during heartwood formation. The exact nature of the compounds responsible for natural durability in redwood is unknown.

Methods

Samples of heartwood from 22 different trees were obtained, ground and extracted using a range of solvents. The ability of some of these extracts to reduce the growth of two fungi (Gloeophyllum trabeum and Trametes versicolor) was tested in vitro. Information on the composition of the extracts was obtained using infrared spectroscopy and gas chromatography.

Results

Fungicidal properties were found in solvent extracts of ground S. sempervirens heartwood samples at concentrations comparable to those known to be present in intact wood. The entire acetone-soluble extracts and ethyl-acetate-soluble fraction of the ethanol extracts caused the greatest reduction in the growth of both fungi tested. Large variations in acetone-soluble or ethanol-soluble extract content and fungicidal activity among trees were found. Agatharesinol and sequerin-C appear to be trace compounds in the dried extracts of S. sempervirens.

Conclusions

Further work is needed to identify the key compounds contributing to the natural durability of S. sempervirens.

Keywords

Sequoia sempervirensRedwoodNatural durabilityExtractivesGloeophyllum trabeumTrametes versicolor

Background

The timber of Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don) Endl. (redwood) is widely used and highly valued for its natural durability, attractive colour, dimensional stability and low density (Cornell [2002]; Cown et al. [2013]). Supply of redwood timber from natural forests is dwindling and classed vulnerable by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (ICUN) (Farjon et al. [2006]). Growing redwoods in planted forest to substitute this resource has the potential to be a highly profitable business in New Zealand, which is helped by the fast growth rates of this species (Cornell [2002]; Palmer et al. [2012]). A key requirement for establishing a redwood industry based on planted forests is to ensure a consistent high quality of the produced timber (Cown [2008]; Cown et al. [2013]). This is especially true for wood from young trees as the desired properties usually improve with tree age (Walker [2006]). The natural durability of redwood timber has been reported to be highly variable, ranging from very durable to moderately/non-durable (Clark and Scheffer [1983]; Scheffer and Morell [1998]; Jones et al. [2011]). Variation in natural durability exists among trees (due to genetic and environmental factors) as well as within trees (mainly associated with cambial age).

The natural durability of timber has been largely attributed to the deposition of low molecular weight secondary metabolites into the wood during heartwood formation (Hillis [1987]; Taylor et al. [2002]). The deposited secondary metabolites are also known as heartwood extractives as they can be extracted by various solvents from the heartwood. Extractives are comprised of numerous organic compounds of which some possess fungicidal, bactericidal or insecticidal properties (Rowe [1989]).

Despite the importance of natural durability to the product and the size of the redwood industry surprisingly little is known of the molecular basis for its natural durability, i.e. the extractive compounds responsible.

This article (a) reviews the existing literature regarding the natural durability of S. sempervirens heartwood and the extractives compounds in this material and (b) provides some experimental data on the quantity and bioactivity of various S. sempervirens extracts and their variability.

Literature review

Natural durability

The natural durability of Sequoia sempervirens heartwood has been assessed in various ways over the years (Table 1). It is interesting to note that some reports indicate that redwood timber is less durable in moist soils (Hedley and Foster [1972]; Johnson et al. [1996]) or climates (Eslyn et al. [1985]; Highley [1995]). This suggests that either water-soluble extracts play a prominent role for the natural durability of this timber or that the fungi present in those environments are more tolerant to the extractives present in S. sempervirens heartwood. Furthermore, high variability of natural durability can be found among and within trees.
Table 1

Published studies assessing the natural durability of Sequoia sempervirens timber

Test type (number and name of species in brackets, if known)

Classification

Origin of timber (type of wood in brackets)

Reference

Field test

Non-durable

unknown

Hedley and Foster [1972]

Laboratory test (ASTM [2005]) (5 brown-rot fungi (Gloeophyllum trabeum, Coniophora olivacea (Fr.) P. Karst., Postia placenta and 2 unidentified isolates) and 5 white-rot fungi (Fuscoporia gilva (Schwein.) T. Wagner & M. Fisch., Pycnoporus coccineus (Fr.) Bondartsev & Singer, Trametes versicolor and 2 unidentified isolates))

Moderately resistant

unknown

Hedley and Foster [1972]

Modified laboratory test (buried) (5 brown-rot fungi (Gloeophyllum trabeum, Coniophora olivacea, Postia placenta and 2 unidentified isolates) and 5 white-rot fungi (Fuscoporia gilva, Pycnoporus versicolor, Trametes versicolor and 2 unidentified isolates))

Non-resistant

unknown

Hedley and Foster [1972]

Laboratory (2 brown-rot fungi (Gloeophyllum trabeum, Postia placenta))

Weight-loss of 18-45%

unknown origin (sawmill boards of widest possible natural range)

Wilcox and Piirto [1976]

Laboratory (16 soft-, brown- and white-rot fungi)

Very resistant against soft-rot, resistant against white-rots and moderately resistant against brown-rots

unknown origin (sapwood)

Eslyn and Highley [1976]

Laboratory (2 brown-rot fungi (Gloeophyllum trabeum and Postia placenta))

Very to moderately resistant

California (outer third heartwood of the top of the butt-log)

Clark and Scheffer [1983]

Field tests (above ground)

Sapwood: 15 years in moist and 25 years in dry climates; heartwood: >20 years in moist and 30 years in dry climates

unknown origin (sapwood and heartwood)

Eslyn et al. [1985]; Highley [1995]

Field test

Durable

unknown

Miller [1986]

Laboratory test (11 soft-rot fungi)

Little weight loss compared to Pinus ponderosa

unknown origin (heartwood)

Morrell and Smith [1988]

Laboratory using termites (Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki)

Termite resistance

California and Oregon (Top-grade glulam stock)

Grace and Yamamoto [1994]

Field test

Durable in dry site; Non-durable in wet-sites

unknown

Johnson et al. [1996]

Laboratory (2 brown-rot fungi (Coniophora puteana (Schumach.) P. Karst., Gloeophyllum trabeum) and 1 white-rot fungus (Trametes versicolor))

Large variation from very-durable (1) to not-durable (5). Site averages (2)-(4) (increasing resistance with age)

New Zealand (22, 38 and 71 years old)

Jones et al. [2011]

Variability among trees

Wilcox and Piirto ([1976]) found a 15-fold variation in weight loss among redwood heartwood samples of the widest possible naturally occurring range of colour intensity. These samples contained wood from old-growth trees and second-growth trees. Their findings were consistent with the large variability in natural durability reported for plantation-grown redwood from New Zealand (Jones et al. [2011], [2014]). Heartwood durability according to Standard EN350-1 (CEN [1994]) varied from ‘not-durable’ to ‘very-durable’, with the majority of samples being ‘durable’ or ‘very-durable’. Also, variable resistance against termite attack has been reported for redwood heartwood sourced from different regions in the USA (Grace and Yamamoto [1994]).

Variability within trees

Sherrard and Kurth ([1933a]) analysed the variation in natural durability within a single redwood stem using a range of decay tests conducted either under field or laboratory conditions. Natural durability significantly increased from pith to bark and slightly from bottom to top in the heartwood of the stem. These radial and axial gradients in natural durability were confirmed for old-growth and second-growth trees (<100 years) (Clark and Scheffer [1983]), and are consistent with the data reported for plantation-grown redwood from New Zealand (Jones et al. [2011], [2014]). Gradients in natural durability have also been observed in other species (Taylor et al. [2002]) and highlight the general inferior wood quality of corewood, the wood formed by cambium of young age (Burdon et al. [2004]).

Extractive content

Extractive content and its variability in S. sempervirens wood has been investigated previously by various researchers (Table 2). Different classes of compounds are extracted by different solvents depending on their solubility. The total amount of extractives is difficult to ascertain as it requires sequential extractions with various solvents (Tappi [1988]).
Table 2

Published data on the yield of various types of extracts from Sequoia sempervirens heartwood

Solvent

Extractive content (%)

Reference

Hot water extract

10.5

Hawley et al. [1924]

5.5-28.2

Sherrard and Kurth [1933b]

8–10

Resch and Arganbright [1968]

3.9-12.7

Wilcox and Piirto [1976]

12.3-26.3

Kuo and Arganbright [1980]

9.9

Hillis [1987]

Cold water extract

14.4

Hawley et al. [1924]

10.5-18.3

Anderson et al. [1960]

5.8-16.2

Anderson et al. [1962]

7-16

Demaree and Erickson [1975]

Ethanol

3.1-5

Cabrera [2008]

Hot ethanol (after hot water)

1.4-8.1

Wilcox and Piirto [1976]

1–2

Resch and Arganbright [1968]

3.0-6.9

Kuo and Arganbright [1980]

Hot ethanol (after cold water)

7.2-12.7

Anderson et al. [1960]

7.8-14.9

Anderson et al. [1962]

Ether

1.1

Hillis [1987]

0.5% NaOH

20

Hillis [1987]

Acetone

13.5

Buchanan et al. [1944]

Approx. 3.2

Anderson et al. [1962]

Hexane

0.1-0.3

Cabrera [2008]

Dichloromethane

1.8-2.0

Cabrera [2008]

The amount of heartwood extract varies greatly among trees, with younger trees generally having lower quantities than older trees (Sherrard and Kurth [1933a]; Anderson [1961]; Resch and Arganbright [1968]; Kuo and Arganbright [1980]). Within stems radial and axial gradients in heartwood extracts follow the natural durability pattern indicating that young trees are less active in metabolising extractives. Additionally, reports of extremely low extractive contents next to the pith for very old S. sempervirens trees (600+ years) suggest a slow degradation of extracts (Resch and Arganbright [1968]).

Bioactivity of S. sempervirens heartwood extracts

Although extractive compounds are likely to be responsible for improving natural durability, it is unclear how active individual compounds of S. sempervirens heartwood are against individual wood decaying fungi. Some work in the past century has attempted to identify various active compounds by investigating the toxicity of fractions of the heartwood extractives against various fungi.

The fungicidal activity of water extracts has been found to vary with fungal species. Cold-water extracts were found to retard the growth of the white-rot fungus Heterobasidion annosum (Fr.) Bref. and hot-water extracts were even more inhibiting (Hawley et al. [1924]; Sherrard and Kurth [1933a]). Cold-water extracts also inhibited the growth of the brown-rot fungi Postia placenta (Fr.) M. J. Larsen & Lombard, Neolentinus lepideus (Fr.) Redhead & Ginns and Gloeophyllum trabeum (Pers.) Murrill although hot-water extracts did not (Anderson et al. [1962]). Interestingly, water extracts from sapwood showed some activity against Heterobasidion annosum (Hawley et al. [1924]). The water-insoluble compounds from an acetone extract (largely phlobaphenes) did not affect growth of Postia placenta, Neolentinus lepideus and Gloeophyllum trabeum (Anderson et al. [1962]). An ethyl acetate extract did not show any activity against Phytophthora ramorum Werres, De Cock & Man in 't Veld (Manter et al. [2007]). Cabrera ([2008]) found no bioactivity from hexane, dichloromethane or ethanol extracts on Postia placenta and Trametes versicolor (L.) Lloyd when tested at concentrations as high as 24,000 ppm. Wood extracted with hot-water lost most of its resistance against decay by Postia placenta and also exhibited partly reduced resistance against decay by Neolentinus lepideus and Gloeophyllum trabeum (Anderson et al. [1962]). Acetone extraction slightly reduced the natural durability against Postia placenta but this was not attributed to the removed extractives but rather the higher temperatures to which the wood was exposed for solvent removal (Anderson et al. [1962]). The durability of S. sempervirens heartwood against Postia placenta and Gloeophyllum trabeum was correlated with the amount of matter present in the ethanol extracts after hot-water extraction while no correlation was found for the hot-water extractable material (Wilcox and Piirto [1976]).

Chemical nature of heartwood extracts in S. sempervirens

The structures of individual compounds found in heartwood of S. sempervirens trees are largely unknown. Some studies report the structures of compounds isolated from small twigs that likely do not contain heartwood but a mixture of leaves, bark and sapwood (Gadek and Quinn [1989]; Zhang et al. [2004]; Zhang et al. [2005]). Others analysed isolated leaves (as summarised by Erdtman and Norin [1966]), cones (Kritchevsky and Anderson [1955]) or bark (Lewis et al. [1944]). The extracts in these plant tissues are known to differ greatly (Anderson [1961]). Therefore, it is unclear if any of these reported compounds are present in heartwood.

Early analyses of S. sempervirens heartwood extracts quantified several broad classes of compounds. The composition of a typical water extract of green S. sempervirens heartwood was summarised by Anderson ([1961]). The major compounds were condensed tannins (Buchanan et al. [1944]), several cyclitols (Anderson et al. [1968]) and unidentified polyphenolics. Other unspecified components, carbohydrates (mainly arabinose) (Smith and Zavarin [1960]) and colouring matter (Sherrard and Kurth [1933b]) are present as minor compounds. The composition of a typical water-insoluble heartwood extract was reported to consist of about three quarters phlobaphenes and the remaining quarter contained similar amounts of native lignin, phenolics, fatty acids, waxes and neutrals (Anderson [1961]).

Several norlignans have been isolated from S. sempervirens heartwood (as summarised by Rowe [1989]). These include sugiresinol (also known as sequerin-A) (Sherrard and Kurth [1933b]; Balogh and Anderson [1965]), hydroxysugiresinol (also known as sequerin-B), sequerin-C (also known as sequerin) (Hatam and Whiting [1969]; Riffer and Anderson [1967]), sequerin-D (Begley et al. [1973]), yateresinol (Erdtman and Harmatha [1979]) and probably agatharesinol (Henley-Smith and Whiting [1976]; Rowe [1989]; Castro et al. [1996]). Methyl anisate, anisaldehyde, and p-dimethoxybenzene were also listed by Henley-Smith and Whiting ([1976]).

Chemical reactions of S. sempervirens heartwood extracts

Biosynthesis of norlignans differs from that of lignans (Suzuki and Umezawa [2007]; Yoshida et al. [2006]). There is evidence that the conversion of agatharesinol into sequerin-C involves enzymes (Imai et al. [2009]) but an abiotic conversion mechanism has also been proposed (Erdtman and Harmatha [1979]). These norlignans have also been proposed to be a precursor of tannins/phlobaphenes in S. sempervirens which polymerise by enzyme- or acid-catalysis (Erdtman and Harmatha [1979]). Norlignans, in particular agatharesinol and sequerin-C, have been connected to the natural durability of Cryptomeria japonica (L. f.) D. Don heartwood (Ohtani et al. [2009]). C. japonica is a species related to S. sempervirens (Gadek et al. [2000]; Christenhusz et al. [2011]). The role of norlignans in the natural durability of S. sempervirens has been suggested by Balogh and Anderson ([1965]) but not considered in subsequent studies (e.g. Piirto and Wilcox [1981]). The bioactivities of norlignans (Suzuki and Umezawa [2007]) and lignans (MacRae and Towers [1984]) have been reviewed.

The influence of drying on the natural durability of redwood has been investigated in various studies (Anderson et al. [1960]; Scheffer and Eslyn [1961]; Anderson et al. [1962]). Temperatures above 77°C (as well as pre-steaming and solvent drying) reduced the natural durability of redwood timber. The oxidation of heartwood compounds was found to be a contributing factor. Reduced resistance against the brown-rot fungus Fomitopsis palustris (Berk. & M. A. Curtis) Gilb. & Ryvarden and termites following high temperature drying were also reported for C. japonica. The decrease in termite resistance was attributed to a loss in agatharesinol and sequerin-C (summarised by Matsushita et al. [2008]).

Redwood heartwood is pale in the freshly felled green state and changes colour when exposed to the atmosphere (e.g. Sherrard and Kurth [1933b]; Balogh and Anderson [1965]). A similar phenomenon is observed in the heartwood of C. japonica where the observed colour change has been related to the present norlignans, which change colour upon air-oxidation (with the exception of agatharesinol and sugiresinol) (Takahashi and Mori [2006]). Discolouration of the heartwood of S. sempervirens can also occur (Ellwood et al. [1960]). It has been related to the presence of sequerin-C (Balogh and Anderson [1965]) and is facilitated by partial oxygen pressure, (low) pH, temperature and heavy metals (Zavarin and Smith [1962]).

Materials and methods

Materials

Samples for assessing the effects of different solvents on extractive recovery and their composition were obtained from the inner five annual rings of heartwood from a single 17-year-old Sequoia sempervirens tree (Tree A). This tree was located on the North Island, New Zealand and sampled at breast height.

Samples for assessing the variability of heartwood extracts were obtained from a further 21 different US or New Zealand grown S. sempervirens trees (Trees B–V). Heartwood was collected at breast height from the inner seven year rings.

All samples were milled to pass a 2 mm screen and stored in a desiccator over dry silica gel prior to use.

The brown-rot fungus Gloeophyllum trabeum (ICMP 13887) and the white-rot fungus Trametes versicolor (ICMP 18215) were obtained from the International Collection of Micro-organisms from Plants (Landcare Research, New Zealand). These fungi are used in international standards (e.g. CEN [1994], Australian Wood Preservation Committee [2007]) for assessing the natural durability of wood. Solvents (water, ethanol, acetone, ethyl acetate or dichloromethane (DCM)) used for the extraction of wood were of HPLC grade. Fungal growth was assessed using a base of malt-extract agar (Merck) containing 30.0 g L−1 malt extract, 3.0 g L−1 soymeal peptone and 15 g L−1 agar.

Methods

Extractions: S. sempervirens heartwood was extracted using an Accelerated Solvent Extractor (Thermo) equipped with 33 mL cells. In each run ~7.2 g of dry milled heartwood (accurately weighed) was extracted. The extraction conditions were two cycles at 70°C for 15 min (static time) followed by a rinse using 50% of the cell volume, resulting in approx. 70 mL of extract. Extractions for the bioactivity of the extracts were performed in duplicate. The limited amount of material from Trees B-V did not allow replication of the extractions of the 21 samples used for the variability tests. Extractive content was measured gravimetrically after drying at 105°C using a third of each extract. The ethyl acetate soluble fraction of the ethanol extract (EtOH → EtAc) was obtained by removing the ethanol in a vacuum rotary evaporator then re-dissolving the residue in ethyl acetate and shaking overnight; the non-soluble fraction was removed by filtration. The remaining two thirds of each extract were used directly for the fungal assay described below.

Fourier Transform-Infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy: Spectra of the dried portion of each extract were taken in duplicate with a Tensor 37 spectrometer (Bruker) using the Attenuated Total Reflectance (ATR) sampling technique. Each spectrum was composed of 32 scans. No qualitative difference between the replicates of each extract was found so the four spectra (two replicate FT-IR measurements of two extractions per solvent) were averaged. Spectra were normalised to the aromatic signal at 1510 cm-1.

Gas chromatography (GC): Air dried extracts were dissolved in pyridine at a concentration of approximately 100 g L−1. A 15 μL aliquot of each solution was trimethylsilylated at room temperature using 50 μL of N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)-trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA, Sigma-Aldrich) in a septum-sealed vial for 20 min according to the supplier's recommendations. The trimethylsilyl derivatives were analysed by GC on a CP-3800 (Varian) chromatograph fitted with a fused-silica capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm/Equity®-1) using helium as the carrier gas (1.2 mL min−1) and FID detection at 300°C. The initial oven temperature was set to 116°C, ramped up to 280°C at 10°C min−1 and held for 40 min. Sequerin-C and agatharesinol (isolated from Metasequoia glyptostroboides Hu & Cheng by ChemFaces Biochemical Co., Wuhan, P.R.C) were used as reference materials.

Fungal assays: Malt agar gels (4.8 % w/v) containing the remaining extract (i.e. from 4.8 g of dry wood) were prepared so that the amount of extract in each gel corresponded to the extractive content of the wood sample. Each extract solution (~50 mL) was added to 100 mL of distilled water. Each solution was placed in a water bath (80°C) until no solvent odour was noticeable to remove fungicidal effects of the extraction solvent. This step took approximately 6 h. Care was taken to prevent the extracts from drying. Any loss of water due to evaporation was corrected by making the final volume up to 100 mL with distilled water. Malt agar (4.8 g) was added and the solution was autoclaved (121°C, 10 min) and poured into 50 mm diameter petri dishes (five petri dishes for each extract and each fungus). Solvent controls containing the equivalent amount of solvent but no extractives underwent the same procedures as the malt agars containing wood extracts. Plates were allowed to cool. After gelation, a small amount of fungus was placed in the centre of each petri dish. Fungi were grown at 25°C. Two perpendicular diameters of the fungus in each petri dish were measured approximately every 24 h over the course of a week using a pair of digital callipers. The absolute growth rate (mm h−1) was calculated by fitting a linear regression for the averaged diameter against time for each petri dish. The experiment was duplicated for testing different solvent extracts but only a single extraction was possible due to the small sample size when assessing the variability of the extracts in 21 separate tree samples.

Statistics: Solvent controls showed that potentially remaining solvent traces had no significant effect on the growth of the individual fungi so the control data were pooled (n = 30) to calculate the reference growth rate. As no statistically significant differences were found between the duplicate extractions using a F-test, the respective data were pooled (n = 10) to calculate the average absolute growth rate for each fungus and solvent extract. The relative growth rates were calculated as the ratio between the reference growth rate for the individual fungi and the different solvent extracts. Standard errors of the ratios were estimated (Kendall et al. [1994]).

Results and discussion

Yields of S. sempervirens heartwood extracts

The amount of material extracted from the inner heartwood of a 17-year-old S. sempervirens tree (Tree A) grown in New Zealand with different solvents (Table 3) was in the lower range to previously published data (Table 2) but generally in accordance with it. A lower extractive content can be expected in this material as it originates from wood close to the pith from a young tree (Sherrard and Kurth [1933a]). The high variability in the recorded extractive contents for individual solvents is due to a) the highly variable nature of the material (Sherrard and Kurth [1933a]) and b) differences in the experimental extraction set-up among different studies (Hawley et al. [1924], Resch and Arganbright [1968], Table 3). Most matter was extracted with the polar solvents ethanol and water, while little was extracted with the non-polar solvents DCM and ethyl acetate. Less than half the amount of material from the wood is extractable directly with ethyl acetate compared with the ethyl acetate soluble fraction of the ethanol extract. This indicates that ethyl acetate soluble compounds were tightly fixed in the cell wall and a more polar solvent like ethanol is needed to swell the cell wall for their removal. Similar amounts of material were extracted from the heartwood using acetone as obtained in the ethyl acetate soluble fraction of the ethanol extract.
Table 3

Yield of extract from the inner five annual heartwood rings from Tree A and the inner seven annual heartwood rings from Trees B-V. Given values are the averages of duplicate extractions

Solvent

Extract (%) of dry wood

 

Inner heartwood of Tree A

Heartwood of Trees B to V; min – max. (mean in brackets)

Water

5.2

 

Ethanol

6.4

5.4 – 12.8 (8.9)

Ethanol → Ethyl acetate1

3.5

 

Acetone

3.7

1.4 - 5.1 (2.6)

Ethyl acetate

1.4

 

Dichloromethane

0.6

 

1Ethanol → Ethyl acetate: ethyl acetate soluble fraction of the ethanol extract.

Bioactivity of extracts

The bioactivity of the heartwood extracts of Tree A were assessed by the rate of growth of two test fungi, Trametes versicolor (white-rot) and Gloeophyllum trabeum (brown-rot) (Table 4). The white-rot T. versicolor grew approximately twice as fast as the brown-rot G. trabeum. However, the growth of both fungi was retarded by a similar percentage (Table 4). The DCM extract caused the least amount of growth retardation against G. trabeum but the low level of material in this extract appeared to make it the most potent. In contrast, the DCM extract led to an increase in growth of T. versicolor. Extracts have the potential to enhance fungal growth if they contain suitable food sources. This might be the case for the DCM extract and T. versicolor. The acetone and ethanol extracts showed the highest amount of growth retardation against both species of fungi but the higher level of material in these fractions meant that their potency appeared lower than that of the DCM extract against G. trabeum. In the case of the ethanol extracts, the bioactivity was contained in its ethyl acetate soluble fraction. The ethyl acetate insoluble fraction of the ethanol extract did not show any bioactivity towards the two test fungi (data not shown). Conflicting reports on the bioactivity of S. sempervirens heartwood water extracts are found in the literature. These can be attributed to the temperature at which extracts were prepared and to the species of fungi tested (Hawley et al. [1924]; Sherrard and Kurth [1933a]; Anderson et al. [1962]). While fungicidal properties were reported against some fungi, Anderson et al. ([1962]) found no fungicidal activity of water extracts against G. trabeum. Additional to differences in sample preparation, it is possible that the level of active compounds was below the required threshold as the concentration of extract present in the agar was not given.
Table 4

Effect of extracts from the inner five annual rings of Sequoia sempervirens heartwood (Tree A) on the growth of Gloeophyllum trabeum (Gt) and Trametes versicolor (Tv)

Fungus

Solvent

Absolute growth rate (mm h−1)

Standard error of absolute growth rate (mm h−1)

Relative growth rate1(%)

Standard error of relative growth rate (%)

Potency2(%(activity)%(extractive content)−1)

Gt

Water

0.222

±0.0055

80

±1.1

4

Ethanol

0.197

±0.0049

71

±1.0

5

Ethanol → Ethyl acetate3

0.183

±0.0024

65

±0.6

10

Acetone

0.174

±0.0025

62

±0.6

10

Ethyl acetate

0.213

±0.0049

76

±1.0

17

Dichloromethane

0.239

±0.0035

85

±0.8

25

 

Control

0.274

±0.0023

   

Tv

Water

0.428

±0.0050

77

±0.7

4

Ethanol

0.320

±0.0107

58

±1.1

7

Ethanol → Ethyl acetate3

0.278

±0.0115

50

±1.1

14

Acetone

0.335

±0.0096

60

±1.0

11

Ethyl acetate

0.465

±0.0056

84

±0.8

11

Dichloromethane

0.569

±0.0045

103

±0.9

−5

 

Control

0.553

±0.0040

   

1calculated as the ratio between the reference growth rate and the different solvent extract growth rates for the individual fungi.

2calculated as the relative reduction in growth rate divided by the percentage of extract from Table 3.

3Ethanol → Ethyl acetate: ethyl acetate soluble fraction of the ethanol extract.

Acetone extracts were found to retard growth of both fungi tested to a similar extent as the ethanol extracts (Table 4) although they comprised only roughly half the weight (Table 3) so were roughly twice as potent (Table 4). This is somewhat at odds with observations by Anderson et al. ([1962]) who reported that acetone extraction of solid wood (in contrast to water extraction) only slightly reduced decay resistance against G. trabeum. To verify the findings of the current study, another sample from Tree A was extracted with acetone in a Soxhlet apparatus for 8h. The extraction liquor was collected and all the solvent evaporated (which facilitated chemical changes). The remaining solid was bioactive as it slowed the growth of G. trabeum to 76% (data not shown). This result showed that that compounds with fungicidal properties were present in acetone extracts independent of extraction method and that they are reasonably stable against chemical degradation.

Ethyl acetate extracts contained compounds capable of retarding fungal growth of both T. versicolor and G. trabeum (Table 4); however the inability of the solvent to swell the cell wall due to its low polarity only partially removes the active compounds. Manter et al. ([2007]) tested the activity of ethyl acetate extracts from S. sempervirens heartwood against Phytophthora ramorum (sudden oak death) but could not detect any activity.

The compounds in the ethanol extract were found to have a high contribution to the fungicidal activity of S. sempervirens heartwood (Table 4). The mass loss of solid S. sempervirens heartwood blocks after incubation with G. trabeum was reported to correlate with the amount of ethanol extractable matter (Wilcox and Piirto [1976]). The bioactivity of the ethanol extract of S. sempervirens heartwood obtained in the current study was contained in the ethyl acetate soluble fraction (Table 4). This was consistent with the fact that the resistance of sugi (Cryptomeria japonica) against butt-rot was related to compounds in the ethyl-acetate-soluble fraction of ethanol heartwood extracts (Ohtani et al. [2009]).

In summary, none of the extracts completely inhibited fungal growth in vitro.

Chemical features of the extracts

Information about the chemical structure of the components of the various extracts was obtained using FT-IR spectroscopy (Figure 1). The abundance of functional groups in the extracts reflected the polarity of the solvent used for their extraction. Aliphatic groups (3000–2800 cm−1) were more and hydroxyl groups (3600–3000 cm−1) less abundant in the extracts obtained with the non-polar solvents DCM and ethyl acetate compared to those obtained with the more polar solvents water, acetone and ethanol (Figure 1A). A qualitative difference between the water extracts and those obtained with organic solvents was observed for the signals originating from carboxyl groups (1800–1700 cm−1). The water extract shows only one band at ~1770 cm−1 in this region while the band at ~1730 cm−1 is absent (Figure 1B). A band at ~1730 cm−1 was reported in Thuja plicata Donn (western red cedar) heartwood extracts and associated with γ-lactones, which are present in some lignans (e.g. originating from internal esters of plicatic acid) (Johansson et al. [2000]).
Figure 1

FT-IR spectra of extracts from the inner five annual rings of Sequoia sempervirens heartwood (Tree A) prepared using five different solvents. A: 3700 – 2700 cm−1 region. B: 1850 – 450 cm−1 region.

Gas-chromatograms of the TMS derivatives of the water, ethanol, acetone and the ethyl-acetate-soluble fraction of the ethanol extract each contained components with the same retention times (Figure 2). However, these varied in proportion to each other. The water extract produced strong peaks at 10.45, 10.7 and 11.7 min that were only very weak in the other extracts. The DCM extract contained different compounds than the other extracts. Compared to the ethanol extract, the ethyl acetate soluble fraction of the ethanol extract had less material present at retention times between 8 and 12 min compared to the compounds eluting between 18 and 24 min.
Figure 2

Gas chromatograms of TMS derivatives of extracts from the inner five annual rings of Sequoia sempervirens heartwood (Tree A) prepared using five different solvents. Top: 8 – 12 min and bottom: 18 – 23.5 min. Chromatograms normalised to the peak at 11.14 min and offset; DCM extract x100.

The norlignans sequerin-C and agatharesinol have been associated with the natural durability of S. sempervirens and C. japonica heartwood (Ohtani et al. [2009]; Balogh and Anderson [1965]). These and several other norlignans have been identified in S. sempervirens wood (e.g. Rowe [1989]). However, based on a comparison of GC retention times, these two compounds appeared to be present only in trace amounts in the extracts of dried S. sempervirens heartwood tested here. Norlignans have been described as unstable i.e. ‘being easily oxidised to amorphous substances’ and very acid sensitive and therefore cumbersome to isolate from seasoned wood (Erdtman and Harmatha [1979]). This could be a reason why larger quantities of those compounds were not detected here. The low levels of sequerin-C and agatharesinol could explain why characteristic FT-IR features, like a double peak ~1500 cm−1, of such compounds (Balogh and Anderson [1965]) were not observed in IR spectra of the extracts tested here (Figure 1).

Variability of S. sempervirens heartwood extracts

The quantity of acetone-soluble material extracted from the first seven annual rings of heartwood from Trees B-V ranged from 1.4% to 5.1% (average of 2.6%) (Table 3). The amount extracted from the inner five annual heartwood rings from Tree A was within this range (3.7%, Table 3). Similar varaibility was found in the bioactivity expressed as the growth rate of G. trabeum and T. versicolor on malt agar containing each acetone extract (Figure 3, Table 5). When fitting a linaer model to the data displayed in Figure 3, the amount of acetone-soluble material could explain 69% of the variation in growth rate for the white-rot T. versicolor while it acounted for only 16% of the variation of the growth rate for the brown-rot G. trabeum. This indicated that the fungicidal activity of the extracts was not determined only by the quantity of extractives but also the relative amounts of the numerous compounds present.
Figure 3

The relationship between the yield of acetone-soluble extract from heartwood of the inner seven annual rings from Trees B-V on the growth rates of the brown-rot fungus Gloeophyllum trabeum (lower case) and the white-rot fungus Trametes versicolor (upper case).

Table 5

Effect of acetone-soluble extracts from the inner seven annual heartwood rings from Trees B-V on the growth of Gloeophyllum trabeum (Gt) and Trametes versicolor (Tv)

Fungus

Absolute growth rate (mm h−1)

Relative growth rate1(%)

min. – max. (mean in brackets)

min. – max. (mean in brackets)

Gt

0.213 – 0.371 (0.293)

65 – 112 (89)

Tv

0.329 – 0.544 (0.426)

64 – 106 (83)

1calculated as the ratio between the reference growth rate and the different solvent extract growth rates for the individual fungi.

The quantity of ethanol-soluble material extracted from the inner seven annual rings of heartwood from Trees B-V ranged from 5.4% to 12.8% (average of 8.9%) (Table 3). The amount extracted from heartwood less than five years old from Tree A was within this range (6.4%, Table 3). Wilcox and Piirto ([1976]) found that the mass loss of solid S. sempervirens heartwood blocks after incubation with G. trabeum was correlated to the amount of ethanol-soluble material in the wood (R2 = 0.69).

Conclusion

The entire acetone-soluble extracts and ethyl-acetate-soluble fraction of the ethanol extracts caused the greatest reduction in the growth of both fungi tested. The norlignans sequerin-C and agatharesinol were only present in trace amounts within the bioactive extracts of dried S. sempervirens heartwood, indicating that other compounds contribute to the natural durability.

Large variation in the amount of acetone-soluble material as well as the bioactivity of those extracts against the fungi G. trabeum and T. versicolor was found among 21 redwood samples. The variability of the growth rate of the fungi was only partially explained by the quantity of the acetone-soluble material. Natural durability is an essential feature of S. sempervirens heartwood and the large variability in extract content and in vitro antifungal activity demonstrated here has implications on the quality S. sempervirens timber.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The samples were kindly provided by Wade Cornell. We would like to thank Richard Woollons (New Zealand School of Forestry) for advice regarding the statistical analysis of the data. The work was financially supported by the University of Canterbury Summer Scholarship Program.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
New Zealand School of Forestry, University of Canterbury

References

  1. Anderson AB: The influence of extractives on tree properties. 1. California redwood ( Sequoia sempervirens ). Journal of the Institute of Wood Science 1961, 8: 14–34.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson AB, Duncan CG, Scheffer TC: Effect of drying conditions on durability of california redwood. Forest Products Journal 1962,12(7):311–312.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson AB, Ellwood EL, Zavarin E, Erickson RW: Seasoning stain of redwood lumber. Forest Products Journal 1960, 10: 212–218.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson AB, Riffer R, Wong A: Chemistry of the genus sequoia - VI: On the cyclitols present in heartwood of Sequoia sempervirens . Phytochemistry 1968,7(10):1867–1870. 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)86661-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Durability of Wood and Wood-based Products – Natural Durability of Solid Wood. Part 1: Guide to the principles of testing and classification of the natural durability of wood. 1994.Google Scholar
  6. Standard test method of accelerated laboratory test of natural decay resistance of woods. 2005.Google Scholar
  7. Protocols for assessment of wood preservatives. ᅟ, Clayton, Australia; 2007.Google Scholar
  8. Balogh B, Anderson AB: Chemistry of the genus Sequoia—II : isolation of sequirins, new phenolic compounds from the coast redwood ( Sequoia sempervirens ). Phytochemistry 1965,4(4):569–575. 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)86218-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Begley MJ, Davies RV, Henley-Smith P, Whiting DA: Constitution of sequirin-D ( Sequoia sempervirens ), a novel dihydronaphthalene norlignan. Journal of the Chemical Society-Chemical Communications 1973, 18: 649–650. 10.1039/c39730000649View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Buchanan MA, Lewis HF, Kurth EF: Chemical nature of redwood tannin and phlobaphene. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 1944, 36: 907–910. 10.1021/ie50418a008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Burdon RD, Kibblewhite RP, Walker JCF, Megraw RA, Evans R, Cown DJ: Juvenile versus mature wood: a new concept, orthogonal to corewood versus outerwood, with special reference to Pinus radiata and P. taeda . Forest Science 2004,50(4):399–415.Google Scholar
  12. Cabrera Y: Improving the durability of second growth timbers of natural durable species. Master thesis (Wood Science), Oregon State University, US; 2008.Google Scholar
  13. Castro MA, Gordaliza M, DelCorral JMM, SanFeliciano A: Distribution of lignanoids in the order coniferae. Phytochemistry 1996,41(4):995–1011. 10.1016/0031-9422(95)00512-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Christenhusz MJM, Reveal JL, Farjon A, Gardner MF, Mill RR, Chase MW: A new classification and linear sequence of extant gymnosperms. Phytotaxa 2011, 19: 55–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Clark JW, Scheffer TC: Natural decay resistance of the heartwood of coast redwood Sequoia sempervirens (D-Don) Endl. Forest Products Journal 1983,33(5):15–20.Google Scholar
  16. Cornell W: The New Zealand Redwood Growers Handbook. Diversified Forests Ltd., Henderson, NZ; 2002.Google Scholar
  17. Cown D: Redwood in New Zealand - an end-user perspective. New Zealand Journal of Forestry 2008,52(4):35–41.Google Scholar
  18. Cown D, Marshall H, Silcock P, Meason D: Sawn timber grade recovery from a planted coast redwood stand growing in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 2013, 43: 1–11. 10.1186/1179-5395-43-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Demaree LA, Erickson RW: The temperature dependent effect of extractive content on redwood shrinkage. 1975.Google Scholar
  20. Ellwood EL, Anderson AB, Zavarin E, Erickson RW: The effect of drying conditions and certain pretreatments on seasoning stain in California redwood. Forest Science 1960,6(4):315–330.Google Scholar
  21. Erdtman H, Harmatha J: Chemistry of the order Cupressales.58. Phenolic and Terpenoid heartwood constituents of Libocedrus-Yateensis. Phytochemistry 1979,18(9):1495–1500. 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)98482-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Erdtman H, Norin T: The chemistry of the order Cupressales. Fortschritte der Chemie Organischer Naturstoffe (Vienna) 1966, 24: 206–287.Google Scholar
  23. Eslyn WE, Highley TL: Decay resistance and susceptibility of sapwood of 15 tree species. Phytopathology 1976,66(8):1010–1017. 10.1094/Phyto-66-1010View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Eslyn WE, Highley TL, Lombard FF: Longevity of untrested wood in use above ground. Forest Products Journal 1985,35(5):28–35.Google Scholar
  25. Sequoia sempervirens. 2006.Google Scholar
  26. Gadek PA, Alpers DL, Heslewood MM, Quinn CJ: Relationships within Cupressaceae sensu lato : a combined morphological and molecular approach. American Journal of Botany 2000,87(7):1044–1057. 10.2307/2657004View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Gadek PA, Quinn CJ: Biflavones of Taxodiaceae. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 1989,17(5):365–372. 10.1016/0305-1978(89)90049-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Grace JK, Yamamoto RT: Natural resistance of Alaska-cedar, redwood, and teak to Formosan subterranean termites. Forest Products Journal 1994,44(3):41–45.Google Scholar
  29. Hatam NAR, Whiting DA: The constituents of Californian redwood: the constitution, absolute stereochemistry, and chemistry of sequirin-B and sequirin-C. Journal of the Chemical Society C: Organic 1969, 14: 1921–1932. 10.1039/j39690001921View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Hawley LF, Fleck LC, Richards CA: The relation between durability and chemical composition in wood. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 1924, 16: 699–700. 10.1021/ie50175a015View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Hedley ME, Foster JB: Modified soil/block technique for assessing wood decay. New Zealand Journal of Forest Science 1972,2(2):287–248.Google Scholar
  32. Henley-Smith P, Whiting DA: New norlignans of Sequoiadendron gigantea ; phytochemical comparison with Sequoia sempervirens . Phytochemistry 1976,15(8):1285–1287. 10.1016/0031-9422(76)85096-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Highley TL: Comparative durability of untreated wood in use above ground. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 1995,35(4):409–419. 10.1016/0964-8305(95)00063-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Hillis WE: Heartwood and tree exudates (Springer series in Wood science). Springer Verlag, Berlin; 1987.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Imai T, Asai K, Takino M, Fukushima K: In vitro hydroxylation of a norlignan: from agatharesinol to sequirin C and metasequirin C with a microsomal preparation from Cryptomeria japonica . Phytochemistry Letters 2009,2(4):196–200. 10.1016/j.phytol.2009.07.002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Johansson CI, Saddler JN, Beatson RP: Characterization of the polyphenolics related to the colour of western red cedar ( Thuja plicata Donn) heartwood. Holzforschung 2000,54(3):246–254. 10.1515/HF.2000.042View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Johnson GC, Thornton JD, Nguyen NK: An in-ground natural durability field test of Australian timbers and exotic reference species.11. Results after more than 25 years' exposure. Material Und Organismen 1996,30(3):219–230.Google Scholar
  38. Jones T, Meder R, Low C, O'Callahan D, Chittenden C, Ebdon N, Thumm A, Riddell M: Natural durability of the heartwood of coast redwood [ Sequoia sempervirens (D.Don) Endl.] and its prediction using near infrared spectroscopy. Journal of near Infrared Spectroscopy 2011,19(5):381–389. 10.1255/jnirs.952View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Jones TG, Low CB, O’Callahan DR, Chittenden CM: Variation in the wood properties of coast redwood trees in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 2014, 44: 11. 10.1186/s40490-014-0011-xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Kendall MG, Stuart A, Ord JK, O'Hagan A: Kendall's advanced theory of statistics. Halsted, New York; 1994.Google Scholar
  41. Kritchevsky G, Anderson AB: Chemistry of the genus Sequoia. 1. The cone solid of coast redwood ( Sequoia sempervirens ) and giant sequoia ( Sequoia gigantea ). Journal of Organic Chemistry 1955,20(10):1402–1406. 10.1021/jo01127a019View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Kuo ML, Arganbright DG: Cellular-distribution of extractives in redwood and incense cedar. 1. Radial variation in cell wall extractive content. Holzforschung 1980,34(1):17–22. 10.1515/hfsg.1980.34.1.17View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Lewis HF, Brauns FE, Buchanan MA, Kurth EF: Chemical composition of redwood bark. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 1944, 36: 759–764. 10.1021/ie50416a022View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. MacRae WD, Towers GHN: Biological-Activities of Lignans. Phytochemistry 1984,23(6):1207–1220. 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)80428-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Manter D, Kelsey R, Karchesy J: Antimicrobial activity of extractable conifer heartwood compounds toward Phytophthora ramorum . Journal of Chemical Ecology 2007,33(11):2133–2147. 10.1007/s10886-007-9368-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Matsushita Y-I, Sugamoto K, Miyakubo K, Kurogi C, Matsui T, Oda H, Fujimoto H: Chemical changes in terpenes of sugi ( Cryptomeria japonica ) wood during steam drying in kiln at high temperature. Journal of Wood Science 2008,54(6):476–482. 10.1007/s10086-008-0980-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Miller DJ: Service life of treated and untreated fence posts: 1985 Post-farm report. Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University, Corvallis; 1986.Google Scholar
  48. Morrell JJ, Smith SM: Fungi colonizing redwood in cooling-towers - Identities and effects on wood properties. Wood and Fiber Science 1988,20(2):243–249.Google Scholar
  49. Ohtani Y, Noguchi T, Ichiura H: Relationship between sugi butt-rot disease and norlignans in the heartwood. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 2009,55(2):92–100. 10.2488/jwrs.55.92View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Palmer DJ, Watt MS, Kimberley MO, Dungey HS: Predicting the spatial distribution of Sequoia sempervirens productivity in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 2012, 42: 81–89.Google Scholar
  51. Piirto DD, Wilcox WW: Comparative properties of old-growth and young-growth giant sequoia of potential significance to wood utilization. University of California Division of Agricultural Sciences Bulletin 1981, 1901: 1–26.Google Scholar
  52. Resch H, Arganbright DG: Variation of specific gravity, extractive content, and tracheid length in redwood trees. Forest Science 1968,14(2):148–155.Google Scholar
  53. Riffer R, Anderson AB: Chemistry of the genus Sequoia—IV. : the structures of the C17 phenols from Sequoia sempervirens . Phytochemistry 1967,6(11):1557–1562. 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)82950-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Rowe JW: Natural products of woody plants (Springer series in wood science). Springer Verlag, Berlin; 1989.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Scheffer TC, Eslyn WE: Effect of heat on the decay resistance of wood. Forest Products Journal 1961, 11: 485–490.Google Scholar
  56. Scheffer TC, Morell JJ: Natural durability of wood: a worldwide checklist of species. Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University, Corvallis; 1998.Google Scholar
  57. Sherrard EC, Kurth EF: Distribution of extractive in redwood - its relation to durability. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 1933, 25: 300–302. 10.1021/ie50279a014View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Sherrard EC, Kurth EF: The crystalline coloring compounds in redwood extract. Journal of the American Chemical Society 1933, 55: 1728–1732. 10.1021/ja01331a072View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Smith LV, Zavarin E: Free mono- and oligo-saccharides of some Californian conifers. Tappi 1960, 43: 218–221.Google Scholar
  60. Suzuki S, Umezawa T: Biosynthesis of lignans and norlignans. Journal of Wood Science 2007,53(4):273–284. 10.1007/s10086-007-0892-xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Takahashi K, Mori K: Relationships between blacking phenomenon and norlignans of sugi ( Cryptomeria japonica ) heartwood III: coloration of norlignans with alkaline treatment. Journal of Wood Science 2006,52(2):134–139. 10.1007/s10086-005-0733-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. T 264 om-88, Preparation of wood for chemical analysis. 1988.Google Scholar
  63. Taylor AM, Gartner BL, Morrell JJ: Heartwood formation and natural durability - a review. Wood and Fiber Science 2002,34(4):587–611.Google Scholar
  64. Walker J: Primary wood processing. Principles and practice. Springer, Dordrecht; 2006.Google Scholar
  65. Wilcox WW, Piirto DD: Decay resistance in redwood ( Sequoia sempervirens ) heartwood as related to color and extractives. Wood and Fiber 1976,7(4):240–245.Google Scholar
  66. Yoshida K, Nishiguchi M, Hishiyama S, Kato A, Takahashi K: Generation and alteration of norlignans in a transition zone during the drying of a Cryptomeria japonica log. Journal of Wood Science 2006,52(4):372–375. 10.1007/s10086-005-0777-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Zavarin E, Smith L: Processes underlying discoloration of redwood ( Sequoia sempervirens ) during drying and in use. Holzforschung 1962,16(1):11–17. 10.1515/hfsg.1962.16.1.11View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Zhang Y-M, Tan N-H, He M, Lu Y, Shang S-Q, Zheng Q-T: Sequosempervirin A, a novel spirocyclic compound from Sequoia sempervirens . Tetrahedron Letters 2004,45(22):4319–4321. 10.1016/j.tetlet.2004.04.038View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhang Y-M, Tan N-H, Yang Y-B, Lu Y, Cao P, Wu Y-S: Norlignans from Sequoia sempervirens . Chemistry & Biodiversity 2005,2(4):497–505. 10.1002/cbdv.200590030View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Davies et al.; licensee Springer 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.