A National heightage model for Pinus radiata in New Zealand
 Mina van der Colff^{1} and
 Mark O Kimberley^{2}Email author
DOI: 10.1186/11795395434
© van der Colff and Kimberley; licensee Springer. 2013
Received: 26 March 2013
Accepted: 26 March 2013
Published: 15 May 2013
Abstract
Background
Historically, a series of regional heightage functions have been used to predict height growth of Pinus radiata in New Zealand. However, for some regions there are no available models while other regions have more than one available model.
Methods
To remedy this situation, a new system of heightage growth models for P. radiata in New Zealand was developed from a nationwide database using nonlinear mixed modelling techniques.
Results
When tested by cross validation, a simple national model performed poorly compared to a series of models with different parameters for each region, demonstrating the existence of regional differences in the form of the heightage relationship. Examination of the regional behaviour suggested that the effect of temperature is best represented by a commonasymptote family of curves, while other factors such as water availability and nutrition appear to be better represented by anamorphic families of curves. A national heightage model reflecting this behaviour was developed. This model is a polymorphic form of the BertalanffyRichards function, with the slope parameter expressed as a linear function of latitude and elevation.
Conclusions
This general model was found to perform better than a series of regional models, and is therefore recommended as a general purpose heightage model for P. radiata in New Zealand.
Keywords
Heightage curves Height Growth model Site index Latitude Elevation Pinus radiataBackground
Plantation forests in New Zealand cover approximately 1.7 million hectares (Ministry for Primary Industries, 2012), about 6% of the land area. Within this forest, Pinus radiata D. Don, is by far the dominant species, occupying about 90% of the plantation forest area. The ability to accurately forecast growth is important for the efficient management of forests, for exploring management options and silvicultural alternatives, and for guiding forest policy. To achieve this for P. radiata in New Zealand, a number of standlevel empirical growth models have been developed. An important component in any standlevel growth model is the heightage function which predicts height growth and allows height to be projected forward in time from a measurement.
Most heightage functions require an estimate of Site Index (SI) to allow the model to adjust the height growth trajectory for site effects. Site Index is defined as the height of the dominant trees in the stand at a reference base age, and is not greatly influenced by stand density. For P. radiata in New Zealand, the base age is usually set at 20 years after planting. The height variable generally used in evaluating the dominant height in P. radiata is Mean Top Height (MTH), which is defined as the mean height of the 100 largest diameter stems of wellformed trees per hectare (Burkhart & Tennent 1977). Site Index is usually determined for a particular stand by applying an inverse form of the heightage function to a heightage measurement. These definitions of SI and MTH were used in the current study.
The first published system for predicting height growth of P. radiata in New Zealand was provided by a SI chart published by Lewis (1954). However, Beekhuis (1966) recommended that local heightage curves should be fitted leading to the development of numerous localised curves. Regression methods of fitting heightage functions began to be applied in the 1970s, for example by Bailey & Clutter (1974) who developed Site Index equations for the Central North Island of New Zealand, the region with the greatest resource of P. radiata.
A more comprehensive analysis of height growth was provided by Burkhart & Tennent (1977) who fitted heightage curves to permanent sample plot data from throughout New Zealand. They used the BertalanffyRichards function (Richards, 1959): H = a(1  exp(bT))^{ c }. A polymorphic form of the function in which both the asymptote and slope parameters were expressed as functions of SI was used. After experimenting with various functions, they chose, a = SI/(1  exp(20b_{1}SI))^{ c } and b = b_{1}SI. To estimate the parameters c and b_{ 1 }, they firstly estimated SI for each plot using height measurements close to age 20, and then fitted the modified BertalanffyRichards equation using a standard nonlinear regression procedure. They found that there was significant regional variation among the parameters, and ultimately divided their data into eight regions, with separate coefficients estimated for each region.
A series of regional growth models incorporating heightage functions were developed during the 1980s (Garcia, 1979, 1983, 1984, 1988; Shula, 1989). These models were also based on the BertalanffyRichards function. To fit the function, the derivative of height growth was expressed as a function of height, and parameters were estimated using a maximum likelihood procedure, fitting height increment against height. For most of these regional models, the asymptote and shape parameters, a and c, were held constant with b varying locally, creating a family of polymorphic curves having a common asymptote. However, in one model intended for use in coastal sands forests, an anamorphic function with b and c held constant, and a varying locally, was found to perform better (Goulding, 1994). In contrast to these BertalanffyRichards models, a model developed for use in the Central North Island by Woollons & Hayward (1985) was based on the Schumacher equation (Schumacher, 1939).
There is a general recognition that climate and soil greatly influence the height growth of P. radiata. For example, numerous studies have demonstrated relationships between SI and climatic and/or soil variables. These have been carried out in New Zealand (Hunter & Gibson, 1984; Palmer et al., 2009; Palmer et al., 2010; Watt et al., 2010), Australia (Truman et al., 1983), South Africa (Grey, 1989; Louw, 1991) and Chile (Schlatter, 1987). However, none of these studies considered whether the shape or form of the heightage relationship is influenced by environmental factors, and whether, for example, two stands from different sites with the same SI may have different growth trajectories.
In contrast, in the empirical fitting of heightage functions described above, there has been a tendency to recognise that there are regional differences in the shapes of these functions. These have generally been accommodated by fitting separate regional models rather than by incorporating environmental variables directly into the models. However, there has been little systematic analysis of how the shape of heightage curves varies between regions, and what environmental factors influence these.
This has led to a somewhat confusing situation for forest managers who are confronted with a series of different models with limited guidance on which ones are most appropriate for a given stand. There are currently some regions with no available model, and others for which more than one model has been developed. Some functions were developed using less advanced fitting procedures and less extensive data than are currently available, and this has most likely led to considerable variation in model performance. Because of this, there is clearly a need for a systematic analysis of regional differences in heightage curves. The objective of this study was to carry out such an analysis, and to develop either a single heightage function for P. radiata in New Zealand, or if necessary, a family of regional functions covering all sites in New Zealand.
Methods
Data
Suitable data were extracted from the Permanent Sample Plot (PSP) (Ellis & Hayes, 1997) database maintained by Scion, Rotorua, New Zealand. Plots had to satisfy a number of criteria including:

Each plot should contain growth data covering a suitable age range (with a minimum age range of 10 years). Plots with long measurement histories were considered to be of particular value.

Stocking should fall within the normal range.

An endeavour was made to obtain an adequate number of plots within each region of the country (preferably more than 50).
The variables required for the analysis were MTH and age. In addition, the following site information was also obtained for each plot: Location (North/South Island, region, latitude and longitude), elevation, and establishment date. Although this site information was limited, it should be noted that an important environmental variable, mean temperature, is largely controlled by latitude and elevation, with mean temperature reducing by approximately 1°C for every two degrees increase in latitude, and for every 200 m increase in elevation.
Summary of plots used in fitting and validating the heightage functions
Modelling dataset  Validation dataset  

Variable  Min  Mean  Max  Std. Dev.  Min  Mean  Max  Std. Dev. 
MTH (m)  2.1  20.7  56.6  9.5  1.9  20.8  51.8  9.6 
Age (yrs)  3.0  14.8  60.5  7.4  3.0  14.9  59.1  7.5 
SI (m)  8.9  28.5  43.4  4.6  14.2  28.9  42.4  4.5 
Stocking (stems/ha)  150  346  1000  165  150  329  1000  158 
Latitude (°;S)  34.40  39.34  46.40  2.79  34.40  39.07  46.20  2.48 
Longitude (°;E)  152.70  174.58  178.30  2.26  152.70  174.83  177.90  2.33 
Elevation (m, a.s.l.)  0  270  1000  205  0  287  1000  210 
Numbers of plots and measurements and means of important variables by region for the modelling and validation datasets
Region  Modelling dataset  Validation dataset  

Plots  Meas.  Age  SI  Lat.  Elev.  Plots  Meas.  Age  SI  Lat.  Elev.  
Northland/Auckland  164  1,089  14  30.2  36.0  135  42  288  12  30.2  35.9  147 
Waikato  301  2,122  16  30.7  37.8  235  59  417  15  30.6  37.7  228 
Bay of Plenty  669  7,565  15  31.3  38.4  408  173  1,950  15  31.6  38.4  395 
Gisborne  70  490  11  31.3  38.2  338             
Hawkes Bay  269  1,881  11  30.6  39.5  369  75  568  11  30.0  39.4  378 
WanganuiManawatu  73  530  16  26.3  39.6  428  16  96  16  26.2  39.6  467 
Wellington  50  363  15  28.8  41.0  246             
Marlborough  80  546  12  28.9  41.3  232  27  193  12  28.1  41.3  224 
Nelson/Tasman  260  1,910  15  28.9  41.4  393  66  469  15  28.5  41.4  383 
West Coast  93  616  17  25.7  42.5  238  27  196  17  25.6  42.4  204 
Canterbury  162  1,198  14  24.0  43.3  297  39  277  14  24.7  43.3  291 
Otago  141  954  16  24.3  46.0  224  34  227  15  24.4  46.0  215 
Southland  65  668  15  27.1  45.8  207             
Coastal sand  540  3,881  16  24.7  36.8  49  144  1,018  17  25.0  36.8  55 
Analysis
A variety of sigmoidal heightage curves have been used to model height growth (see Zeide (1993) for a list of three and four parameter growth functions). In this study, the BertalanffyRichards, Schumacher, Hossfeld, and Weibull models were tested. The BertalanffyRichards or ChapmanRichards model (von Bertalanffy, 1949; Richards, 1959) is one of the most commonly used forestry growth equations, as is the Schumacher model (Schumacher, 1939). The Hossfeld model was originally proposed for describing tree growth as early as 1822 (Peschel, 1938), while the Weibull model is the cumulative form of a widely used probability distribution function that has proved to be a good model of tree growth (Yang et al., 1978).
Standard (S) and reparameterised (R) forms of the heightage functions used in the study
Growth function  Type  Equation 

BertalanffyRichards  S  MTH = 0.25 + (c  0.25)(1  exp(aT))^{1/b} 
R  MTH = 0.25 + (SI  0.25)[(1  exp(aT))/(1  exp(20a))]^{1/b}  
Hossfeld  S  MTH = 0.25 + (c  0.25)(T^{ b })/(a + T^{ b }) 
R  MTH = 0.25 + (SI  0.25)(T/20)^{ b }[(a + 20^{ b })/(a + T^{ b })]  
Schumacher  S  MTH = 0.25 + (c  0.25)exp(aT^{ b}) 
R  MTH = 0.25 + (SI  0.25)exp(a(1/20^{ b }  1/T^{ b }))  
Weibull  S  MTH = 0.25 + (c  0.25)(1  exp(aT^{ b })) 
R  MTH = 0.25 + (SI  0.25)[(1  exp(aT^{ b }))/(1  exp(a 20^{ b }))] 
All models were fitted as nonlinear mixed models using the SAS macro NLINMIX. The algorithm implemented in this macro is similar to the first order method of Sheiner & Beal (1985). It fits nonlinear models containing global, fixedeffect parameters, and local, normally distributed random effectparameters. In this analysis, local parameters were estimated for each plot. Goodness of fit was assessed using Schwarz’s Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) (Schwarz, 1978), a measure widely used to compare nonlinear mixed models which accounts for the number of parameters when comparing models. Differences in BIC can be used to compare competing models, with better fitting models having smaller BIC values. A commonly used ruleofthumb states that two models are indistinguishable if their BICs differ by less than 2, but when the BICs of competing models differ by more than 10 this is strong evidence in favour of the model with the smaller BIC.
Three model types were fitted:

Type A: Simple national models. Both anamorphic and commonasymptote forms of all four models shown in Table 3 were tested along with a more general polymorphic form as described below.

Type B: A more complex national model based on the best Type A form, but including site variables such as elevation and latitude in the formulation.

Type C: A family of regional models for the regions shown in Figure 1 consisting of the same model forms used for Type A but with separate parameters estimated for each region.
For Type A models, both anamorphic and commonasymptote forms of all four functions were tested. The anamorphic form was based on the reparameterised form of each growth function (Table 3), with SI fitted as a local parameter varying between plots, while the shape (b) and slope (a) parameters were fitted as fixed global parameters. In the commonasymptote form, the standard form of each growth function (Table 3) was fitted using global asymptote (c) and shape (b) parameters, and a local slope (a) parameter. A more general polymorphic form based on the reparameterised forms (Table 3) was fitted in which SI was fitted as a local parameter, and the shape and slope parameters were expressed as linear functions of SI. Various nonlinear functions of SI for expressing the slope and shape parameters were also tested, but none of these clearly outperformed simple linear functions.
Type B models were developed as extensions of the general polymorphic Type A models. Firstly, the reparameterised forms of the growth functions (Table 3) were fitted with all three parameters treated as local random parameters. The parameters a and b were then plotted against available site variables as well as SI. Suitable functional forms were chosen on the basis of these plots, and the model refitted using these functions, and treating SI as a local random parameter.
The Type C models were fitted using dummy variables for each region coded 1 for PSPs within the region and 0 otherwise. Three model forms were tested: an anamorphic form with separate shape and slope parameters for each region; a commonasymptote form with separate shape and asymptote parameters for each region and local slope parameter; and a general polymorphic form based on the reparameterised growth functions with SI fitted as a local parameter, and with separate shape and slope parameters for each region which also contained linear terms in SI.
The precision of MTH prediction across a range of ages was examined by cross validation using the validation data set. To thoroughly test the performance of each model for a range of ages, height at a given age was predicted from an earlier measurement for each plot and compared with the actual height using the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE = $\sqrt{{\left(y\widehat{y}\right)}^{2}/n}$, where y is MTH and ŷ is predicted MTH). This analysis was performed for starting ages of 10 to 30 years in steps of 5 years, and prediction ages from 5 years after the starting age to 35 years, also in steps of 5 years. The analysis was also performed using the model development dataset.
Results
Bayesian information criteria (BIC) for different forms of heightage models
Type  Form  BertalanffyRichards  Hossfeld  Weibull  Schumacher 

A  Anamorphic  79,458  79,528  79,538  80,742 
Commonasymptote  81,617  82,391  81,339  82,882  
General polymorphic  78,634  78,436  78,873  79,441  
B  Polymorphic with site variables  73,006  73,380  73,462  75,167 
C  Regional Anamorphic  75,850  75,830  75,988  77,160 
Regional commonasymptote  73,461  75,335  74,409  78,190  
Regional general polymorphic  73,441  73,953  73,354  75,326 
Parameter estimates with standard errors for Type A forms of the BertalanffyRichards function fitted to the national dataset
Form  Parameter  Estimate  Std. Error 

Anamorphic  a  0.05695  0.00037 
b  0.6406  0.0022  
Commonasymptote  b  0.7307  0.0024 
c  64.47  0.28  
General polymorphic (Equation 1)  a _{ 0 }  0.0693  0.0026 
a _{ 1 }  4.66E04  0.86E04  
b _{ 0 }  0.388  0.016  
b _{ 1 }  8.58E03  0.54E03 
Parameter estimates with standard errors for the Type B form of the BertalanffyRichards function (Equation 2 ) fitted to the national dataset
Parameter  Estimate  Std. Error 

a _{ 0 }  0.1409  0.0019 
a _{ 1 }  1.96E03  0.05E03 
a _{ 2 }  3.38E05  0.06E05 
b _{ 0 }  0.5141  0.0058 
b _{ 1 }  4.57E03  0.18E03 
Parameter estimates with standard errors for Type C regional forms of the BertalanffyRichards function
Region  Commonasymptote  General polymorphic  

b _{ i }  c _{ i }  a _{ 0i }  b _{ 0i }  
Est.  S.E.  Est.  S.E.  Est.  S.E.  Est.  S.E.  
Northland/Auckland  0.710  0.005  56.9  0.5  0.0329  0.0028  0.442  0.019 
Waikato  0.684  0.004  58.1  0.3  0.0380  0.0026  0.381  0.018 
Bay of Plenty  0.657  0.002  61.1  0.2  0.0295  0.0026  0.399  0.018 
Gisborne  0.682  0.007  63.7  1.1  0.0228  0.0042  0.461  0.025 
Hawkes Bay  0.677  0.004  60.5  0.5  0.0213  0.0030  0.474  0.019 
WanganuiManawatu  0.653  0.007  60.4  0.7  0.0105  0.0025  0.537  0.018 
Wellington  0.640  0.009  60.8  0.8  0.0139  0.0039  0.501  0.028 
Marlborough  0.649  0.006  58.0  0.8  0.0253  0.0035  0.443  0.022 
Nelson/Tasman  0.638  0.004  57.8  0.4  0.0341  0.0027  0.382  0.018 
West Coast  0.631  0.007  52.7  0.6  0.0452  0.0034  0.355  0.020 
Canterbury  0.629  0.005  49.5  0.5  0.0373  0.0031  0.412  0.018 
Otago  0.594  0.005  54.6  0.5  0.0202  0.0023  0.467  0.017 
Southland  0.641  0.007  54.6  0.7  0.0242  0.0046  0.463  0.027 
Coastal sand  0.785  0.004  45.1  0.2  0.0457  0.0023  0.481  0.016 
SI coefficient (a_{1} and b_{1})          8.73E04  0.82E04  7.04E03  0.55E03 
The BIC of Type C models was consistently smaller than for the best Type A models indicating the existence of regional differences in heightage relationships (Table 4). For these regional models, the commonasymptote forms performed better than the anamorphic forms. However, the BIC for the BertalanffyRichards Type B model was smaller than that of any of the Type C regional models. This result suggests that by including latitude and altitude in its formulation, this national model adequately accounts for regional differences in the heightage relationship.
RMSE (m) of predictions from varying starting and prediction ages for both the validation and model datasets
Measurement age (years)  Prediction age (years)  Validation dataset  Model dataset  

Type A  Type B  Type C  Type A  Type B  Type C  
10  15  0.97  0.84  0.84  0.95  0.83  0.82 
20  1.43  1.18  1.21  1.53  1.28  1.31  
25  1.80  1.38  1.52  1.98  1.57  1.72  
30  1.94  1.45  1.70  2.18  1.71  1.71  
35  2.48  1.49  2.14  2.68  1.24  1.33  
15  20  1.05  0.95  0.98  1.11  1.02  1.02 
25  1.59  1.35  1.47  1.73  1.42  1.51  
30  1.91  1.49  1.69  1.99  1.64  1.68  
35  2.93  1.90  2.29  2.96  1.50  1.60  
20  25  1.25  1.13  1.18  1.35  1.18  1.21 
30  1.76  1.48  1.58  1.91  1.49  1.49  
35  2.90  2.26  2.46  3.27  1.93  1.87  
25  30  1.20  1.16  1.22  1.39  1.28  1.35 
35  1.98  1.92  2.07  2.59  1.77  1.76  
30  35  1.03  1.41  1.44  1.04  1.37  1.47 
RMSE (m) of predictions for each region in New Zealand for both the validation and model datasets using the Type B and C forms of the BertalanffyRichards function
Region  Validation dataset  Model dataset  

Type B  Type C  Type B  Type C  
Northland/Auckland  1.64  1.55  1.67  1.40 
Bay of Plenty  1.67  1.67  1.31  1.53 
Waikato  1.60  1.71  1.46  1.54 
Gisborne  n/a  n/a  0.72  0.77 
Hawkes Bay  1.14  1.10  1.09  1.07 
WanganuiManawatu  1.57  1.45  1.10  1.05 
Wellington  n/a  n/a  1.09  1.09 
Marlborough  1.20  1.41  1.06  1.10 
Nelson/Tasman  1.12  1.32  0.97  1.12 
West Coast  1.32  1.33  1.31  1.48 
Canterbury  1.15  1.11  0.99  0.93 
Otago  0.94  1.07  1.02  0.92 
Southland  n/a  n/a  0.76  0.63 
Coastal sand  1.42  1.36  1.44  1.41 
where MTH (m) and T (years) are the heightage measurement. This estimate of SI is used to obtain a new estimate of b and the procedure is repeated until SI has been estimated to a sufficient level of accuracy. At most, 10 iterations are required to estimate SI to two decimal places. Although this introduces an additional layer of complexity in the use of the model, it is clearly justified by the superior performance of the model.
Discussion
In this study, different heightage model forms were found to be appropriate for models fitted for P. radiata at a national level, and at a regional level. When a general polymorphic model was fitted to a nationwide dataset, its behaviour was much closer to the anamorphic than the commonasymptote form (Figure 2a). Conversely, when a series of regional heightage models was fitted, they tended more to the commonasymptote form (Figure 2b). Furthermore, the series of regional models fitted much better overall than the simple national model. This behaviour validates the decision to generally use commonasymptote models for the family of regional heightage models developed in the 1980s (Garcia, 1979, 1983, 1984, 1988; Shula, 1989). However, given the better performance of the anamorphic form at the national level, at first sight the superior performance of commonasymptote models at the regional level is puzzling.
It seems likely that the contrasting model behaviour at the national and regional scales must reflect differences in how various environmental variables influence P. radiata height growth. The SI of this species is known to be strongly influenced by a number of environmental variables. Principally among these is air temperature, with SI decreasing with reducing temperature from a maximum at a mean annual temperature of approximately 13°C which is typical of lower elevation sites in the central North Island (Hunter & Gibson, 1984; Watt et al., 2010; Palmer et al., 2010). Other factors affecting SI reported by one or more of these studies include available root zone water storage, various measures of soil nutrition, and mean wind speed. The effect of temperature on SI is clearly apparent in our dataset, with SI averaging 3031 m in the Northland/Auckland and Waikato regions of the North Island, but only 2427 m in the cooler Otago and Southland regions of the South Island (Table 2).
A careful examination of the regional behaviour of P. radiata heightage models suggests that the effect of temperature is better represented by a commonasymptote rather than an anamorphic family of curves. For example, in the warmer Northland/Auckland and Waikato regions, the mean SI is 30.5 m (Table 2) and the mean asymptote is 57.6 m (commonasymptote model c parameter, Table 7), implying that 53% of asymptotic height is achieved at age 20 years. In contrast, in the cooler Otago and Southland regions, the mean SI and asymptote are 25.7 m and 54.6 m respectively, implying that only 47% of ultimate height is achieved at age 20 years. A similar general trend of slower height development on cooler sites is apparent in other regions with, for example, the higher elevation forests in the WanganuiManawatu region only achieving 44% of their asymptotic height at age 20 years.
A tendency for height to develop more slowly with reducing temperature can also be seen within regions. For example, within the Bay of Plenty region in the North Island, there is a strong altitudinal gradient from coastal sites where SI can be greater than 35 m to cooler elevated inland sites where SI may only be 25 m (Palmer et al., 2010). When the BertalanffyRichards model was fitted separately to the Bay of Plenty data (analysis not shown), the commonasymptote form was strongly favoured over the anamorphic form, with a slight further improvement in fit provided by the general polymorphic form. Using the polymorphic model, the asymptotes for SI 25 m and 35 m are 55.9 m and 59.0 m respectively, implying that respectively 45% and 59% of asymptotic height are achieved at age 20 years.
However, it appears that, environmental variables other than temperature may have a scaling effect rather than altering the rate of height development, and are therefore better represented by an anamorphic rather than a commonasymptote family of curves. The clearest example of this is seen by comparing the nutrient deficient coastal sand sites in the Northland/Auckland and Waikato regions of the North Island with more fertile clay soils in the same regions. The average SI and asymptote of the coastal sand forests are 24.7 m (Table 2) and 45.1 m (Table 7) respectively, implying they achieve 55% of asymptotic height by age 20 years, while as noted above, more fertile sites in these regions achieve 53% of maximum height at the same base age. Therefore, a model performing well on both coastal sand and clay sites in the northern North Island would have to approximate the anamorphic form. Another example is provided by two lower productivity South Island regions, Canterbury (SI 24 m) which has lowest rootzone water availability, and the nutrient deficient West Coast (SI 25.7). Both these regions achieve 49% of their asymptotic height at age 20 years, very similar to the 50% achieved in the more productive Marlborough, Nelson and Southland regions.
In summary, it appears that temperature effects on P. radiata height growth may be better approximated by a family of commonasymptote curves, while the effects of other environmental factors such as nutrition and water availability may be better represented by an anamorphic family of curves. Reducing temperature causes a slowing in the growth rate whereas poor nutrition or insufficient water results in a downward scaling of the entire heightage curve, but not necessarily any slowing in the rate of development relative to the asymptote. This description is somewhat simplistic as in addition to a slowing in growth rate, there is also some decrease in the asymptote on cooler sites, and there is, therefore, merit in using a general polymorphic family of curves rather than the simpler commonasymptote form to represent the affect of temperature on height growth.
Given the above conclusions, the reason for the superior performance of the Type B model (Equation 3) becomes apparent. The slope (a) parameter of this model is a function of elevation and latitude which, in combination, account for temperature. A change in SI with latitude and elevation remaining constant would represent a change in productivity resulting from a site variable other than temperature. This situation produces behaviour similar to that of an anamorphic family of curves (Figure 2c). However, if the change in SI is caused by temperature (associated with a corresponding alteration in elevation and/or latitude), the resultant behaviour is closer to that of a commonasymptote than an anamorphic family of curves. This can be seen by comparing the model behaviour for two hypothetical sites at latitude 40^{0}S, one a warm, lower elevation site with high SI, and the other a cool, elevated site with low SI (Figure 2d).
Conclusions
Accurate estimation of height growth is essential in stand growth assessment. The nonlinear mixed modelling technique used in this study produced models with good levels of accuracy in estimating height for any given age. A national heightage model for P. radiata in New Zealand was developed which performed favourably compared with individual regional models, and is thus recommended for use as a general purpose height model. The model includes latitude and elevation in its formulation to account for differences in the pattern of height growth with temperature.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge assistance provided by Carolyn Andersen for extracting suitable data from the Scion Permanent Sample Plot system. This study was funded by the Ministry of Research, Science and Technology.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
 Bailey RL, Clutter JL: Baseage invariant polymorphic site curves. Forest Sci 1974, 20: 155–159.Google Scholar
 Beekhuis J: Prediction of yield and increment in Pinus radiata stands in New Zealand. Tech Pap For Res Inst N Z For Serv 1966, 49: 40.Google Scholar
 Burkhart HE, Tennent RB: Site index equations for radiata pine in New Zealand. N Z J For Sci 1977, 7: 408–416.Google Scholar
 Ellis JC, Hayes JD: Field guide for sample plots in New Zealand Forests (FRI Bulletin No. 186). Rotorua, New Zealand: New Zealand Forest Research Institute Limited; 1997.Google Scholar
 Garcia O: Forest Mensuration and Management Systems, Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, New Zealand. Forest Research Institute Symposium. In Mensuration systems for forest management planning. Volume 20. Edited by: Elliot DE. New Zealand: New Zealand Forest Service; 1979:315–334.Google Scholar
 Garcia O: A stochastic differential equation model for the height growth of forest stands. Biometrics 1983, 39: 1059–1072. 10.2307/2531339View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Garcia O: New class of growth models for evenaged stands: Pinus radiata in Golden Downs Forest. N Z J For Sci 1984, 14: 65–88.Google Scholar
 Garcia O: Experience with advanced growth modelling methodology. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NC. In Forest Growth Modelling and Prediction Edited by: Ek AR, Shifley SR, Burke TE. 1988., 120:Google Scholar
 Goulding CJ: Development of growth models for Pinus radiata in New Zealand  experience with management and process models. For Ecol Manage 1994, 69: 331–343. 10.1016/03781127(94)902399View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Grey DC: A sitegrowth study of Pinus radiata in the Southern Cape. South Afr For J 1989, 150: 32–39.Google Scholar
 Hunter IR, Gibson AR: Predicting Pinus radiata site index from environmental variables. N Z J For Sci 1984, 14: 53–64.Google Scholar
 Kimberley MO, Ledgard NJ: Site index curves for Pinus nigra grown in the south island high country, New Zealand. N Z J For Sci 1998, 28: 389–399.Google Scholar
 Lewis ER: Yield of unthinned Pinus radiata in New Zealand. For Res Note N Z For Serv 1954.,1(10):Google Scholar
 Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD Chapter. In SAS system for mixed models. Volume 12. Cary, North Carolina (USA): SAS Institute Inc; 1996:463–489.Google Scholar
 Louw JH: The relationship between site characteristics and Pinus radiata growth on the Tsitsikamma plateau, South Africa. South Afr For J 1991, 158: 37–45.Google Scholar
 Ministry for Primary Industries : National exotic forest description as at 1 April 2012. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry for Primary Industries; 2012.Google Scholar
 Palmer DJ, Höck BK, Kimberley MO, Watt MS, Lowe DJ, Payn TW: Comparison of spatial prediction techniques for developing Pinus radiata productivity surfaces across New Zealand. For Ecol Manage 2009, 258: 2046–2055. 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.07.057View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Palmer DJ, Watt MS, Kimberley MO, Höck BK, Payn T, Lowe DJ: Mapping and explaining the productivity of Pinus radiata in New Zealand. N.Z . J For 2010,55(1):15–19.Google Scholar
 Peschel W: Mathematical methods for growth studies of trees and forest stands and the results of their application. Tharandter Forstliches Jahrburch 1938, 89: 169–247. In GermanGoogle Scholar
 Ratkowsky DA: Handbook of nonlinear regression models. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1990.Google Scholar
 Richards FJ: A flexible growth function for empirical use. J Exp Bot 1959, 10: 290–300. 10.1093/jxb/10.2.290View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Sheiner LB, Beal SL: Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates from several least squares procedures: Superiority of extended least squares. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1985, 13: 185–201. 10.1007/BF01059398View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Schlatter JE: Soil fertility and the development of Pinus radiata . Bosque 1987, 8: 13–19.Google Scholar
 Schumacher FX: A new growth curve and its application to timberyield studies. J For 1939, 37: 819–820.Google Scholar
 Schwarz GE: Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 1978,6(2):461–464. 10.1214/aos/1176344136View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Shula RG: Stand growth model with P fertilizer effects for radiata pine on clay soil (FRI Bulletin No. 148). Rotorua, New Zealand: Ministry of Forestry; 1989:62.Google Scholar
 Truman R, Humphreys FR, Lambert MJ: Prediction of site index for Pinus radiata at Mullions Range State Forest, New South Wales. Aust Forest Res 1983, 13: 207–215.Google Scholar
 von Bertalanffy L: Problems of organic growth. Nature 1949,163(4135):156–158. 10.1038/163156a0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Watt MS, Palmer DJ, Kimberley MO, Höck BK, Payn TW, Lowe DJ: Development of models to predict Pinus radiata productivity throughout New Zealand. Can J For Res 2010,40(3):488–499. 10.1139/X09207View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Woollons RC, Hayward WJ: Revision of a growth and yield model for radiata pine in New Zealand. For Ecol Manage 1985, 11: 191–202. 10.1016/03781127(85)90026XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Yang RC, Kozak A, Smith JHG: The potential of Weibulltype functions as flexible growth curves. Can J For Res 1978, 8: 424–431. 10.1139/x78062View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Zeide B: Analysis of growth equations. Forest Sci 1993, 39: 594–636.Google Scholar
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.